 Image credit: Versailles by Stephanie LeBlanc I’ve been learning more about AI and experimenting with how it can support my creative work. Below is an AI-generated summary of an essay I wrote about Louis XI, which I originally shared here over a year ago. You can find the full essay here. Did Louis XIV Really Have Absolute Power?
At just four years old, Louis XIV became king of France. By the time he died, his reign had lasted 72 years—the longest of any European monarch. Yet, despite ruling from a glittering court at Versailles and becoming the symbol of absolute monarchy, Louis XIV's power was never as total as it appeared. Historian Philip Mansel offers a nuanced portrait in King of the World: The Life of Louis XIV. Although Louis XIV projected strength and control, his reign reveals that power was always entangled with limitations. As political theorist Keith Dowding puts it, "absolute" monarchs still had to negotiate with the nobility, the Church, and internal bureaucracy. Louis XIV was no exception. Childhood and Powerlessness Louis became king at just four years old after his father’s death in 1643, but real governance remained in the hands of his mother, Queen Anne, and Cardinal Mazarin until Louis took over in 1661. His early years were marked not by luxury, but by political instability, civil war (the Fronde), and personal insecurity. Mansel writes, "Even at the age of two, Louis was a pawn in his parents’ marriage." At court, he was raised in a minefield of ceremony and intrigue. Though his mother instilled in him a belief in divine kingship, it is clear that his earliest lessons were in powerlessness. A Monarch Who Worked When Mazarin died, Louis surprised his court by declaring, “I am determined henceforth to govern my state by myself.” He worked obsessively, attending council meetings nearly every day, dictating letters, and overseeing even military strategies. Despite this, Mansel notes: “Despite the King’s hard work, many believed that he could be ‘absolutely governed by his ministers.’” Louis wanted to embody the state, but in reality, he was often overwhelmed by the machinery of governance and the limits of what he could personally control. Versailles: Power on Display Louis transformed Versailles into a symbol of royal magnificence. He micromanaged its design, visited the site frequently, and even wrote a guidebook for showing guests around the gardens. But the accessibility he cultivated at Versailles also signaled his dependence on appearances. The public was usually welcome in palace gardens, and ceremonies like the King’s lever and coucher were open to courtiers, sometimes to the point of chaos. As Mansel observes, “Not even Louis XIV, for all the fear and awe he inspired, was in total control.” The Contradictions of War Louis inherited a strong France, yet his aggressive foreign policies left it financially drained and diplomatically isolated. His desire for glory—sometimes masked as strategy—contributed to unnecessary wars, like the War of Spanish Succession, that devastated his country. One war minister wrote that Louis wanted to show he could conquer "solely by his own judgement," but these military decisions often backfired. The King micromanaged battles from afar, sometimes undermining his own generals. His final wars brought France to the brink of ruin. Religious Zealotry Louis's revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, which had guaranteed rights to Protestants, was one of his greatest errors. He believed Catholicism was essential to French identity and his own divine authority. Yet, by expelling or converting Huguenots—many of whom were skilled professionals—he weakened the economy and further alienated Europe. Ironically, his alliance with the Muslim Ottoman Empire and tolerance of Protestants in Alsace contrasted with his persecution at home. Mansel calls the revocation of the Edict "his single greatest mistake." Power and Powerlessness Louis XIV was certainly powerful—he centralized authority, built a cultural empire, and dominated European politics for decades. But he was also deeply limited:
He cultivated the myth of absolutism, but as his reign progressed, even his admirers grew wary. After his death, public reaction was mixed: solemn tributes alongside mocking songs and laughter. Why This Matters My goal is not to excuse Louis XIV's actions, but to show how human fallibility, emotional needs, and inherited meanings shaped his decisions. He was not just a king with power; he was a person subject to the same psychological and social forces that affect us all. Yes, he made catastrophic mistakes. But those errors were forged in the crucible of court expectations, childhood traumas, and unexamined ideologies. As Mansel notes, Louis XIV "helped unite Europe against France," but he also gave France much of its modern identity. Final Reflection If Louis XIV could see how he is remembered—as a patron of the arts and architecture, but also as a deeply flawed ruler—would he feel pride or despair? Probably both. His life, like all lives touched by great power, illustrates this paradox: the more power one seems to hold, the more one is shaped by forces beyond one’s control. Understanding that paradox is not an act of forgiveness. It is a call for empathy—and for humility, especially in our judgments of others.
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |